Résumé
Résumé
For readers of Nora Ephron, Tina Fey, and David Sedaris, this hilarious, poignant, and extremely frank collection of personal essays confirms Lena Dunham--the acclaimed creator, producer, and star of HBO's Girls --as one of the brightest and most original writers working today.
nbsp;
"If I can take what I've learned in this life and make one treacherous relationship or degrading job easier for you, perhaps even prevent you from becoming temporarily vegan, then every misstep of mine will have been worthwhile. This book contains stories about wonderful nights with terrible boys and terrible days with wonderful friends, about ambition and the two existential crises I had before the age of twenty. About fashion and its many discontents. About publicly sharing your body, having to prove yourself in a meeting full of fifty-year-old men, and the health fears (tinnitus, lamp dust, infertility) that keep me up at night. I'm already predicting my future shame at thinking I had anything to offer you with this book,nbsp; but also my future glory in having stopped you from trying an expensive juice cleanse or having the kind of sexual encounter where you keep your sneakers on. No, I am not a sexpert, a psychologist, or a registered dietician. I am not a married mother of three or the owner of a successful hosiery franchise. But I am a girl with a keen interest in self-actualization, sending hopeful dispatches from the front lines of that struggle."
Critiques (6)
Critique du Publishers Weekly
Reviewed by Rachel Deahl. Filmmaker (Tiny Furniture) and TV creator (Girls) Dunham has been compared to all manner of comic intellectual impresarios, from Woody Allen to Nora Ephron and Tina Fey. This makes it all the more delightful that Dunham mines her first book from an unexpected source: Helen Gurley Brown's Having It All, which she stumbled upon in a thrift store in college. Dunham hopes that her collection of personal essays will do for its intended readers-the young and female-what the one-time Cosmopolitan editor-in-chief's 1982 guide did for her. Having It All is, Dunham admits, full of mostly dated and "bananas" advice-on everything from dieting to man pleasing-but it imparted an important takeaway: meek women can inherit success, love, and self-worth, if not the Earth. Dunham is not unlike these women (or "Mouseburgers," in Brown's words), who can, she explains, "triumph, having lived to tell the tale of being overlooked and underloved." She breaks her book into sections ("Love & Sex," "Body," "Work," etc.) and offers tales of her own experiences being overlooked and underloved. If that sounds corny or overly earnest, the essays that compose the book are neither. They're dark, discomforting, and very funny. Whether discussing her forays into yo-yo dieting (" `Diet' Is a Four-Letter Word") or the time she thinks she might have been raped ("Barry"), Dunham is expert at combining despair and humor. Describing a misanthropic ex, she writes: "His critical nature proved suffocating-he hated my skirts, my friends, and my work. He hated rom-coms and just plain coms." The book is filled with amusing phrases like this one, as Dunham delivers sad-and probably, for many readers, sadly familiar-tales of hating her body and trying too hard to make undeserving men love her. Dunham is an oddly polarizing figure in today's culture-maybe because she's too young and successful; maybe because she gets conflated her with Hannah Horvath, her self-involved character on Girls; or maybe simply because her detractors are louder than her fans-but hopefully this won't keep readers away from this collection. It would be a shame, because the book is touching, at times profound, and deeply funny. It also addresses something that other female funny people of Dunham's stature do not. The myth, as Gurley Brown and others have laid it out, is that we can shed our Mouseburger selves to become something better. While Dunham is eager for that something better, she doesn't want to lose sight of the Mouseburger inside. This is one of the things she grapples with throughout these essays: how we become accepted and loved and popular, without casting aside, or trying to hide, the unloved, unpopular people we once were. In fact, Dunham seems to want to revel in the dark spaces-the terrifying and awkward moments in life-which is pretty great. Not only does this provide her wonderful material, but it's an invigorating, refreshing slap in the face to a world that is so unwelcoming to all the amusing, sweet, smart Mouseburgers out there. (Sept. 30) Rachel Deahl is PW's News Director. © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
Critique de Booklist
*Starred Review* Dunham opens her memoir by reminding readers of the audacity inherent in believing one's own story is worth telling especially if one happens to be a woman and her commitment to this belief is an invisible footnote on every page of her adroit, funny first book. Dunham, who professes to live in a world that is almost compulsively free of secrets, plunges to deep-sea depths of young womanhood with this collection of keenly felt childhood memories and adult ruminations that often seem told expressly to you, the reader she sometimes addresses. She discusses stupid jobs, bad boyfriends, upsetting sex, psychological struggles, and hypotheticals with a smart candor readers would expect from the late-twentysomething producer-writer-director-star of the HBO show Girls, for which she's garnered acclaim and awards. But most arresting are her achingly self-aware and mirthful portrayals of the particular and peculiar sadnesses of growing up, the recurring realization that the many milestones one is led to believe will usher in the next step to adulthood with a distinct ping rarely make a sound at all until one writes about them. Drawings by illustrator Joana Avillez, Dunham's lifelong friend, contribute to the charming, confessional reading.HIGH-DEMAND BACKSTORY: If the author's sold-out tour to accompany the book's release on September 30 and her 1.74 million Twitter followers are any indication, this book's audience is an enthusiastic one.--Bostrom, Annie Copyright 2014 Booklist
Critique du New York Review of Books
FIRST THEY CAME for Lena Dunham, and I did not speak out - because I was not Lena Dunham. There exists a pressure for young women to either align or distance themselves from the creator of "Girls." Fans and critics alike have praised, scrutinized and Photoshopped her, often with skewed motivations. As a result, a critical cocoon has formed around Dunham wherein it's O.K. to acknowledge her as a feminist icon, but beyond that lies a danger zone - after all, who wants one's opinions lumped in with the slavishly sycophantic, the nakedly jealous, the casually misogynistic or the blatantly ageist? Thankfully, Dunham's "Not That Kind of Girl" offers a reprieve from the hubbub, as it was written not by devotees or detractors but by one woman. "Not That Kind of Girl" is a hybrid of essays, emails and lists reminiscent, most recently, of Mindy Kaling's "Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me?" with a bit of Jenny Lawson's "Let's Pretend This Never Happened" sprinkled on top. Dunham uses Helen Gurley Brown's "Having It All" as her launching pad, having purchased the book as "a decorative joke" during college. Now it's time for her own twist. "If I could take what I've learned and make one menial job easier for you," she writes, "or prevent you from having the kind of sex where you feel you must keep your sneakers on in case you want to run away during the act, then every misstep of mine was worthwhile." Learn From My Mistakes, Ladies is a solid theme, and one gets the sense that, even with such a sizable platform, Dunham needed a theme. This is a common conundrum for essayists, the expectation of a singular purpose. So common that one could graft the opening of Meghan Daum's seminal "My Misspent Youth" (to which every confessional essayist of this century owes a debt of gratitude) onto "Not That Kind of Girl." Quoth Daum: "I'm inclined to catalog my experiences and turn them over in my head until some kind of theme emerges and I feel I can link the personal banalities to something larger and worth telling." Dunham, for the most part, succeeds in doing this. Her often hilarious book is divided into five sections: "Love & Sex," "Body," "Friendship," "Work" and "Big Picture." Because we're dealing with a person and not a food pyramid, these topics quickly bleed outside their self-prescribed boundaries. In the first and longest section, we are introduced to a neurotic, self-pitying girl who enjoys the glimpse sex gives her into her "partner's subconscious, which was maybe the only time I actually believed anyone besides me even existed." She feels abnormal, disconnected and friendless. As the book progresses, we learn that she harbors fears of appendicitis, leprosy, headaches, milk, tinnitus and lamp dust. That's the short list. "Not That Kind of Girl" is familiar fare. Dunham chronicles her attempts to lose her virginity and lose weight She tells gut-wrenching stories of sex. She gets a job, goes to camp, grapples with a medical diagnosis and experiments with early iterations of technology. When her sister is bom, she wails "INTRUDER! RETURN HER!" As Nora Ephron said, "everything is copy," and though such topics are well trodden, Dunham makes them shine. Early attempts at intercourse are likened to "shoving a loofah into a Mason jar." She captures the nature of teenage longing ("Her face is so beautiful that sometimes I can't help but imagine it superimposed over my own") and brings us into young adulthood with observations like "I boarded a Greyhound to Ithaca to see a college friend, the kind of purposeless trip you will never take again after age 25." She's also just plain funny: "When I was born I was very fat for a baby - 11 pounds (which sounds thin to me now)." She is at her strongest when she focuses on those she loves. Her sister has "the comforting, sleep-inducing properties of a hot-water bottle or a cat." Her characterizations of her parents are both vivid and kind, a rare overlap for a humor writer. They infuse the book with pocketable lessons ("Luxury is nice, but creativity is nicer" and "Drunk emotions aren't real emotions"). The best essays are platonic love stories: "Little Leather Gloves" centers on old friends and the need for creativity (thus touching on Dunham's day job, something the book does sparingly). "Therapy & Me" is a smoothly star-crossed story of friendship and psychoanalysis. essays that start thematically and drill down for proof are less successful. Instead of building, they read as meandering versions of the lists peppered between them, relying on illustrated breaks in lieu of transitions. "Girl Crush," a herky-jerky meditation on friendship, gives similar real estate to Dunham's first female crush, her grandma Dottie, her friend Deb, a "beautiful depressive" named Leanne, a field trip to Washington, "a prodigious British playwright," a girl named Sofia, back to the playwright, girls she kissed in college and back to the playwright again. Another essay, a kind of open letter to Hollywood men who "have been at it a little too long," is sharply observed but never quite congeals. "Hello Mother, Hello Father" ends with a lovely dream that fails to bring a sense of narrative to the preceding pages. She then tacks on a mini-essay on the same topic, material she apparently couldn't part with when writing the first essay. No darlings were hurt during the making of these chapters. The shorter pieces are influenced by Ephron's "I Feel Bad About My Neck." Some, such as "18 Unlikely Things I've Said Flirtatiously," are inspired ("I'm obsessed with the curtains in your van!"), but others are prone to an everything -but-the-kitchen-sink quality. A chapter called "What's in My Bag" contains exactly what you think it contains. "Emails I Would Send if I Were One Ounce Crazier/Angrier/Braver" is an uncharacteristically bland exercise in vengeance. An 11-page food diary, "the most secret and humiliating document on my computer," is more comprehensive than confessional. Dunham so frequently references her childhood facility for poetry, it's surprising to see none of it reprinted in full here. The real pileup danger, however, lies with her jokes about her own solipsism. Dunham is so adamant that she not apologize for her self-confidence ("This was the time in life before I learned it wasn't considered appropriate by society at large to like yourself") that she beats her critics to the punch, and lines such as "What does this all mean for me?" in response to a grandparent's death can be jarring. This is because the overall portrait of "Not That Kind of Girl" is actually not of a selfish girl. It's of a candid, thoughtful woman who considers being female "a sacred joy," and who, despite her neurosis, simply isn't as self -centered as the character she plays on TV. The final essay, "Guide to Running Away," is written in the second person, a nod to the book's how-to thesis. Here she's too specific and squanders the potential inclusiveness of the format: "Your godparents, also city people, live a mile down the road. She has red hair and cat's-eye glasses; he is bald and does one voice to impersonate all four Beatles," and "Everyone tells you that you look like your aunt." Yet even this essay is as touching for what it achieves as it is for what it tries to achieve - to connect with young women by connecting with herself. But in order to enjoy "Not That Kind of Girl," we must dissolve the "you're either with us or against us" critical barrier around Dunham. She did not come first, and she will not be last, but she has earned the right to be listened to, to be judged on the quality of her writing, even when what we read sounds familiar. If we continue to view her solely through the prism of her fame, to interpret her every blink as a bellwether of modern feminism, Lena Dunham will become, paradoxically, impossible to hear. SLOANE CROSLEY is the author of "I Was Told There'd Be Cake" and "How Did You Get This Number." Her first novel, "The Clasp," will be published next year.
Critique du Guardian
Lena Dunham's first book, like Dunham herself, has accrued a cultural significance that is much greater than the sum of the parts. The daughter of two New York artists, she has been the focus of US media attention since she was a child, to a degree that most people would find bewildering - though she, according to her memoir, took a dissociative pleasure in it. When she was 11, she was interviewed by US Vogue about her thoughts on fashion: "I find Calvin Klein really hard to respect because he's everywhere. I view him as a clothesmonger," the 11-year-old mused. When she was 16, the New York Times, for no obvious reason, covered a "vegan feast" she threw for her friends where shoes were banned: "I just thought it was sort of bohemian-seeming," the teenager explained. Ever since it was announced that, on the back of her debut film, Tiny Furniture, she would be directing, writing and starring in the HBO series Girls, Dunham has been dubbed by the media as the "voice of her generation" - "or at least, a voice," her character Hannah amusingly slurs to her parents while intoxicated in the pilot episode of Girls. Dunham's fans and detractors have, ever since, lionised and demonised the twentysomething to the point that she now represents whatever the hell you want: the blogging generation! Feminism! Misogyny! Just stick a reference to Dunham into your zeitgeisty feature and the youth-obsessed media will clamour to publish it. At the other end of the spectrum, blogs such as Gawker and Jezebel (Gawker's nominally feminist offshoot), staffed largely by people Dunham's age, can't kick her enough. The biggest complaint about her is that she represents all that is wrong with an over-privileged, nepotistic, Caucasian-focused slice of America. When it transpired that there were almost no people of colour in the first series of the show, critics cried racism in a way that no one ever did about the similarly New York-based and generation-defining Seinfeld, Friends or Sex and the City. Dunham has said that this isn't an excuse (she is good at taking criticism, far better than most people who are as much in the public eye as she is), and she's right. But the relevance of that comparison is twofold: first, it's a reminder that, in fact, New York is much more segregated than a lot of people appreciate. I grew up in a similar neighbourhood to Dunham and went to a similar school, and I didn't know a single black person who wasn't my babysitter until I moved to London. What's more, the expectations placed on Dunham to represent all life experiences of everyone of her generation were not only absurd but proved how good a writer she is - if she was bad, no one would have cared what she thought (although none of her critics would ever admit that). Dunham was never going to present an everyman view of the world (whatever that means). But anyone who could look beyond the general media nonsense surrounding her found a precociously smart and supple writer, which should not be a surprise. After all, the New York Times publishes vacuous trend pieces about random people every week, but HBO does not hand out TV series to any old random Calvin Klein-hating, self-consciously bohemian twentysomething. Tiny Furniture has a raw honesty to it that makes Karl Ove Knausgaard look like Whit Stillman. The first two series of Girls (which recently finished its somewhat weaker and broader third series) might have presented a privileged world, but the excellent dialogue and emotional precision outweighed all. At the end of one episode, Adam (Adam Driver), who had heretofore been portrayed purely as Hannah's unknowable lust object, turns the dynamic around and yells at her for being so self-obsessed: "You never ask me anything besides 'Does this feel OK?', or 'Do you like my skirt?', 'How much is your rent?'. You don't want to know me. You want to come over in the night and have me fuck the dog shit out of you and then leave and write about it in your diary!" Which brings us to Not That Kind of Girl, a collection of autobiographical essays, for which Dunham was paid a much-reported $3.7m (pounds 2.3m) by Random House, a figure that is simultaneously ridiculous and absolutely right. The reason she was paid this much is three-fold: first, and less relevantly to the publisher, she is a skilled writer, but there are lots of skilled writers in the world and they don't get seven-figure advances; second, she is Lena Dunham, publicity catnip with devoted fanbase; third, because it is a self-exposing memoir. Where once misery memoirs were the vogue in the publishing world, now it is books by young women writing about what is usually described as "all their flaws", which means everything that happens in their vaginas, from masturbation to menstruation, from sex to cystitis. Clit lit, I guess. Caitlin Moran does this better than anyone else, and she makes it look easy, which it is not. Some will mock Dunham's book for its casual references to her privileged, beyond-parody hipster life: her father's therapist, her mother's nutritionist, the Puerto Rican man she dated "with a tattoo that said MOM in Comic Sans". But it seems a bit rich to demand that young women reveal all about their lives and then criticise them for living the wrong kind of life. Less justifiable, though, is the self-obsession. Dunham writes that when she was younger the only thing she liked about sex was "it was maybe the only time I believed anyone besides me even existed". Judging from the excellent characters she created in Girls, Dunham has long since grown out of that and has empathy in spades, but it is not clear at all from her book. She says that Not That Kind of Girl was originally inspired by Helen Gurley Brown's Having It All, but a more instructive co mparison would be with David Sedaris. Sedaris writes about himself, his family and his neuroses brilliantly, because he always looks outward in his books, describing the world through his own unique perspective. Dunham, by contrast, is an inward writer, and even though she is a pleasure to spend time with, reading this book feels a little like being squashed up inside her bellybutton. After all these pages, I still have no real idea what her family are like. At one point, I started counting the number of times Dunham wrote about vaginas in the book (hers, mainly). I quit when I got to 25. There's sexual honesty, and then there's just sticking your head up your vagina. Some commentators have argued that clit lit it is helpful to teenage girls because it teaches them that bad sex is par for the course. But the other side of the coin is that this genre suggests the only truly interesting thing about a woman is her most intimate personal life. Certainly, Dunham sees her self-exposure as a benevolent feminist act: "There is nothing gutsier to me than a person announcing that their story is one that deserves to be told, especially if that person is a woman," she writes. But saying a story deserves to be told doesn't mean that it inherently does. Later, she writes that a teenage boy once told her that the fact she takes her clothes off so much on the show "made me feel better about myself". But she does not explain why, as the director, she cast conventionally beautiful actors to play all the other characters. Dunham has now made what are essentially three versions of her autobiography by the age of 28: a film, three seasons of a TV show and a book, and the gruel is running thin. The anecdotes in the book often feel like rejected ideas for Girls episodes, which, in fact, at least one of them was. Dunham describes her need to share as a compulsion: "I have to tell my stories in order to stay sane," she writes. But she also needs an editor (or an Adam) who can say to her, "Great, but perhaps we don't actually need to publish a 10-page chapter consisting purely of your food diary?" She is a brilliant talent who will write better books than this - and, really, who can blame her for taking the money and running? It's a shame, though, that her US publishers didn't take more time with her instead of rushing to cash in on the Lena Dunham industry. But then Dunham is probably used to that by now. 288pp, 4th Estate, pounds 11.89 To order Not That Kind of Girl for pounds 12.49 go to bookshop.theguardian.com or 0330 333 6846. - Hadley Freeman Caption: Captions: A one-woman industry . . . Lena Dunham At the other end of the spectrum, blogs such as Gawker and Jezebel (Gawker's nominally feminist offshoot), staffed largely by people [Lena Dunham]'s age, can't kick her enough. The biggest complaint about her is that she represents all that is wrong with an over-privileged, nepotistic, Caucasian-focused slice of America. When it transpired that there were almost no people of colour in the first series of the show, critics cried racism in a way that no one ever did about the similarly New York-based and generation-defining Seinfeld, Friends or Sex and the City. Dunham has said that this isn't an excuse (she is good at taking criticism, far better than most people who are as much in the public eye as she is), and she's right. But the relevance of that comparison is twofold: first, it's a reminder that, in fact, New York is much more segregated than a lot of people appreciate. I grew up in a similar neighbourhood to Dunham and went to a similar school, and I didn't know a single black person who wasn't my babysitter until I moved to London. What's more, the expectations placed on Dunham to represent all life experiences of everyone of her generation were not only absurd but proved how good a writer she is - if she was bad, no one would have cared what she thought (although none of her critics would ever admit that). Dunham was never going to present an everyman view of the world (whatever that means). Anyone who could look beyond the general media nonsense surrounding her found a precociously smart and supple writer, which should not be a surprise. After all, the New York Times publishes vacuous trend pieces about random people every week, but HBO does not hand out TV series to any old random Calvin Klein-hating, self-consciously bohemian twentysomething. Tiny Furniture has a raw honesty to it that makes Karl Ove Knausgaard look like Whit Stillman. The first two series of Girls (which recently finished its somewhat weaker and broader third series) might have presented a privileged world, but the excellent dialogue and emotional precision outweighed all. At the end of one episode, Adam (Adam Driver), who had heretofore been portrayed purely as [Hannah]'s unknowable lust object, turns the dynamic around and yells at her for being so self-obsessed: "You never ask me anything besides 'Does this feel OK?', or 'Do you like my skirt?', 'How much is your rent?'. You don't want to know me. You want to come over in the night and have me fuck the dog shit out of you and then leave and write about it in your diary!" - Hadley Freeman.
Critique de Kirkus
EDITOR'S NOTE: Due to an agreement with the publisher, this review will not be available online until Friday, September 26. Please check back then. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Critique du Library Journal
If you've ever seen yourself in the anxious character Hannah Horvath, then you'll love Girls creator/actress/essayist Dunham's book. Packaged as a blockbuster "how-to" for the girl who wants it all, the book discusses death, sex, and tonsil stones with casual prose and Dunham's usual endearing candor. For her, no topic is forbidden. She artfully implements deadpan humor to balance human frailty with strength in all her stories (even the most mundane, sometimes gross, and often OCD-ridden tales). She looks back on her youthful self through the lens of email exchanges with ex-lovers, extensive food logs, and drab therapy sessions with an astonishing amount of sympathy, especially for someone so critical. Cumulatively, her essays are a lesson in compassion for oneself and understanding others. She makes her hard-won lessons accessible to all readers, whether they're Girls fans or not. If her book helps to make one menial task easier for a reader, Dunham says, "Every misstep of mine was worthwhile." The author may be young, but she's certainly learned a lot. Verdict Expect high demand for this title, especially among Millennials and other fans of Dunham's TV work. As the author says frequently in this book, "Why the hell not?" [See Prepub Alert, 4/21/14.]-Kurt Yalcin, Library Journal (c) Copyright 2014. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.