
Civil War Period (1850-1877) |
United States |
Strategy |
State & Local |
History |
Military |
Zusammenfassung
Zusammenfassung
As William T. Sherman's Union troops began their campaign for Atlanta in the spring of 1864, they encountered Confederate forces employing field fortifications located to take advantage of rugged terrain. While the Confederates consistently acted on the defensive, digging eighteen lines of earthworks from May to September, the Federals used fieldworks both defensively and offensively. With 160,000 troops engaged on both sides and hundreds of miles of trenches dug, fortifications became a defining factor in the Atlanta campaign battles. These engagements took place on topography ranging from Appalachian foothills to the clay fields of Georgia's piedmont.
Leading military historian Earl J. Hess examines how commanders adapted their operations to the physical environment, how the environment in turn affected their movements, and how Civil War armies altered the terrain through the science of field fortification. He also illuminates the impact of fighting and living in ditches for four months on the everyday lives of both Union and Confederate soldiers. The Atlanta campaign represents one of the best examples of a prolonged Union invasion deep into southern territory, and, as Hess reveals, it marked another important transition in the conduct of war from open field battles to fighting from improvised field fortifications.
Rezensionen (1)
Choice-Rezension
Hess, a prolific and imaginative author of numerous books on the American Civil War, examines in great detail the Atlanta campaign of 1864. Rather than explaining the overall strategies and operations of both armies in north Georgia from May to September (an approach already employed with great success by other scholars), he bores down deeper into the generals' use of terrain, tactics, and trenches. He deals with questions seldom asked by earlier writers: Who chose the locations for trenches and other earthworks? Who actually dug the long lines of zigzag ditches? What did each side aim to accomplish with its trenches? How did the Union and Confederate works differ from each other? What tools were used, and how well supplied with those tools were the two armies? How did terrain shape the earthworks and vice versa? How did the elaborate Confederate field fortifications force Union officers to alter their tactics? This fresh approach adds to the understanding of this important campaign and opens new avenues for research on the Civil War and the evolution of 19th-century warfare. Suitable for professionals and general readers. Maps, illustrations, endnotes. Summing Up: Recommended. General readers; upper-division undergraduates through faculty. --Richard G. Lowe, emeritus, University of North Texas