Zusammenfassung
Zusammenfassung
The captivating, untold story of Hermann Rorschach and his famous inkblot test
NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY NPR * New York Post * Sunday Times (UK) * Irish Independent
In 1917, working alone in a remote Swiss asylum, psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach devised an experiment to probe the human mind: a set of ten carefully designed inkblots. For years he had grappled with the theories of Freud and Jung while also absorbing the aesthetic movements of the day, from Futurism to Dadaism. A visual artist himself, Rorschach had come to believe that who we are is less a matter of what we say, as Freud thought, than what we see.
After Rorschach's early death, his test quickly made its way to America, where it took on a life of its own. Co-opted by the military after Pearl Harbor, it was a fixture at the Nuremberg trials and in the jungles of Vietnam. It became an advertising staple, a cliché in Hollywood and journalism, and an inspiration to everyone from Andy Warhol to Jay Z. The test was also given to millions of defendants, job applicants, parents in custody battles, and people suffering from mental illness or simply trying to understand themselves better. And it is still used today.
In this first-ever biography of Rorschach, Damion Searls draws on unpublished letters and diaries and a cache of previously unknown interviews with Rorschach's family, friends, and colleagues to tell the unlikely story of the test's creation, its controversial reinvention, and its remarkable endurance--and what it all reveals about the power of perception. Elegant and original, The Inkblots shines a light on the twentieth century's most visionary synthesis of art and science.
Praise for The Inkblots
"Impressively thorough . . . part biography of Herman Rorschach, psychoanalytic super sleuth, and part chronicle of the test's afterlife in clinical practice and the popular imagination . . . Searls is a nuanced and scholarly writer . . . genuinely fascinating." -- The New York Times Book Review
"A marvelous book about how one man and his enigmatic test came to shape our collective imagination. The Rorschach test is a great subject and The Inkblots is worthy of it: beguiling, fascinating, and full of new discoveries every time you look." --David Grann, author of The Lost City of Z
Rezensionen (5)
Publisher's Weekly-Rezension
In this clear and well-illustrated study, writer and translator Searls shares the histories of Swiss psychoanalyst and psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach as well as his eponymous test's evolution and reception. As Searles notes, Rorschach's test was not totally original; one precedent was the work of Justinus Kerner, a 19th-century German Romantic poet and doctor. Rorschach's genius lay in attending to patient-sensitive specifics, including those of psychotics, and in developing an interpretative code that revolved around how the patient saw movement, color, and form in the inkblots. After Rorschach's 1922 death at age 37, his test saw widespread use in America during the psychoanalytically oriented 1940s and '50s; it was given to every student entering Sarah Lawrence College starting in 1940 and the army used a multiple-choice version after Pearl Harbor. However, it had fallen in popularity by the 1970s, eclipsed by the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and other personality tests. Despite its occasional abuse, the Rorschach regained some of its popularity around the turn of the millennium. Searls dutifully shows how the test added a whole new visual dimension to the emerging field of psychology in general, and the study and analysis of personality in particular. Illus. Agent: Edward Orloff, McCormick Literary. (Mar.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
Booklist-Rezension
Searls portrays Hermann Rorschach (1884-1922) as a man of great accomplishment and greatly unfulfilled potential due to his untimely death, at 37. He made a considerable contribution to the then-burgeoning field of psychoanalysis with his soon-to-be ubiquitous inkblots: 10 symmetrical amorphous shapes utilized as a tool to delve into a person's subconscious mind. Used for everything from party games to attempting to establish whether there is such a thing as a Nazi mind, the Rorschach test has endured for nearly a century, even as it drifts in and out of favor within the psychoanalytic community due to an ongoing debate over how the patient's responses should be interpreted. Very little has previously been known about Rorschach's private life; Searls now fills in many blanks, drawing a more rounded portrait of the Swiss psychiatrist. From his parents' money and health problems to his school nickname, Klex, from klexen, meaning to dabble in painting, to his decision to follow science rather than art, through to his marriage, illness, and death, Rorschach's genius is apparent, and his famous inkblots ever fascinating.--Chavez, Donna Copyright 2017 Booklist
New York Review of Books-Rezension
TYPE THE PHRASE "like a Rorschach test" into Google and what pops up is everything from Hillary Clinton to Cheetos. In popular myth, the famous inkblots, part gothic horror, part toddler splat painting, are a shortcut to our subconscious, plunging through the artifice of our self-presentation and into our darkest mental recesses. In this cartoonish version of the Rorschach, what we see in the blots - whether a butterfly, or the bloodied stumps of our last victim's limbs after we hacked them off with a salad fork - is who we really are. It is perhaps no surprise that the Rorschach metaphor has become a cliché of modern journalism. It's a fascinating idea that what we see in a given situation often reveals as much about our own selves - our quirks and prejudices and vanities - as it does about the thing we are looking at. This back and forth between self and world is at the heart of art and literature and criticism. Within this metaphorical universe, writing a book review is a perfect Rorschach test. Sadly, as it turns out, Rorschach the metaphor is a lot more compelling than Rorschach the reality. The actual test, still in sporadic use, takes a more persnickety, box-ticking approach to the human personality, less magical psychoanalytic Tarot cards and more Myers Briggs tests with splats. The scoring system is tediously technical, and surprisingly what you see in the blots counts less toward your result than the technicalities of how you perceive form and movement. It is the fortunes of this humdrum test that Damion Searls charts in his impressively thorough, if somewhat dry book. "The Inkblots" is part biography of Hermann Rorschach, psychoanalytic supersleuth, and part chronicle of the test's afterlife in clinical practice and the popular cultural imagination. Rorschach, a young psychiatrist with the tousled rom-com looks of Brad Pitt, was working with deeply disturbed patients in a remote Swiss asylum during the golden years of psychoanalysis. Across the Alps, Freud was busy delving into the ids of rich Viennese housewives using an early version of talk therapy. But Rorschach speculated that in understanding the human psyche, what we see might be as important as what we say. A gifted amateur artist, he created the inkblots to see if his patients' differing styles of perception could help parse out the differences between various pathologies. Early results were promising. Schizophrenics responded differently to the blots than manic-depressives, and both responded differently than the people who were "normal" controls. Before long, Rorschach was using the test to diagnose psychiatric illnesses and predict personality traits, claiming that he got it wrong less than 25 percent of the time. Rorschach died suddenly in his mid30s, but his inkblots had already captured the imagination of both experts and the general public. The rest of the book charts that history. While most of us stare at Rorschach tests and see life reflected back at us, Searls apparently looks at life and sees Rorschach tests staring back at him. His inventory of Rorschach sightings in popular culture over the last half-century is encyclopedic. But outside of journalistic cliché, many of the examples he gives feel relatively marginal, more a series of isolated occurrences than a genuine cultural pattern. more significant was the test's impact on clinical practice. At its peak, the Rorschach was used an estimated million times a year, in murder trials and child custody battles, psychiatric diagnoses and college admissions and job applications. It is only toward the end of "The Inkblots" that Searls introduces research showing that when it comes to predicting human behavior, the Rorschach performs no better than chance. Up until this point, he treats the question of whether the test actually works or not as almost an incidental one, an abstract curiosity in his cultural history. But this is a mistake. Psychology's reputation has suffered body blows in recent years, with an epidemic of overclaiming among psychologists, widespread lapses in scientific rigor and the suggestion that only around a third of psychological findings across the board can actually be replicated. In this context, the question of the Rorschach's basic validity is not an interesting aside, but fundamental to the entire story. Searls, a journalist and translator, is a nuanced and scholarly writer, at his best dealing with philosophical abstractions. His passages on the nature of empathy, for example, are genuinely fascinating. But he is less strong on the human side of storytelling. While he goes into rigorous detail about the technicalities of the Rorschach and the infighting among psychologists, his book largely ignores the people at the sharp end, the patients and ordinary folks whose lives have sometimes been cataclysmically affected by the results of the test. Although he refers to a couple of these "case studies" in passing in the final chapters of the book, their stories are told at a remove, as examples drawn from textbooks rather than key players in the narrative. It's not clear that he interviewed many of these people directly (or if he did, those encounters haven't been included in the finished text). In an insightful moment, Searls acknowledges that the Rorschach encourages experts to believe that they can speak for people better than the people can speak for themselves. But he falls into the same trap. Prioritizing the human beings impacted by this history would have made not only for a more readable book, but also a more responsible one. But, to belabor the Rorschach metaphor one last time, Searls should take comfort in the knowledge that any small criticisms I may have almost certainly say more about me than they do about his book. ? RUTH WHIPPMAN is the author of "America the Anxious: How Our Pursuit of Happiness Is Creating a Nation of Nervous Wrecks."
Kirkus-Rezension
A history of 20th-century psychology focused on the life, work, and legacy of the inventor of the inkblot test.Translator, essayist, and fiction writer Searls (What We Were Doing and Where We Were Going, 2009, etc.) became fascinated by the "rich and strange" set of inkblots that, he discovered, are still used for psychological assessment. His investigation into the life of their creator, Swiss physician Hermann Rorschach (1884-1922), led to a trove of material collected by a biographer who died before he could write his book; along with other material, that archive informs Searls' richly detailed, sensitive biography of Rorschach's short life and long afterlife. A student of Eugen Bleuler and Carl Jung, Rorschach was trained at a time when "an orgy of testing" dominated psychology. The son of an artist, with artistic talent himself, Rorschach was alert to modernist art movements, which shaped his ideas about the power of visual images to reveal personality and the power of culture to shape perception. He worked assiduously to craft precisely the symmetrical, mysterious, suggestive images that comprise his test, and he devised "a single psychological system" of evaluation that considered the viewer's response to Movement, Color, and Form. Although he admitted that "it is always daring to draw conclusions about the way a person experiences life from the results of an experiment," when he compared his evaluations of patients against other doctors' diagnoses, he was encouraged about his accuracy. As Searls admits, Rorschach never convincingly explained how and why the inkblots worked. Unfortunately, his system, and the permutations that followed as generations of psychologists attempted to standardize it, proves difficult to follow in the author's otherwise engrossing narrative. Searls is stronger when characterizing the "feuds and backbiting" that the test inspired among practitioners in America, where it "was a lightning rod from the start," and Europe, where, for example, it was applied to assess Nazis on trial at Nuremberg.Searls shows persuasively how the creation and reinvention of inkblots has reflected psychologists' scientific and cultural perspectives. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Library Journal-Rezension
Writer and translator Searls's book describes and analyzes a major tool in psychology, "probably the ten most interpreted and analyzed paintings of the twentieth century." Now out of copyright (they were created in 1917), these images are widely available, but the parlor game is not the test, and vice versa. Medical insurance covers testing and, besides its clinical importance, the Rorschach (as it is known) is widely used by employers. Not a pass-or-fail examination, the Rorschach aims to measure imagination and personality. Its creator, Hermann Rorschach (1884-1922) at 12 lost his mother to diabetes; soon his father married one of his wife's half-sisters, then died in 1903 when Hermann was 18, with three younger siblings. Reader-friendly, this book has 24 chapters, including "The Queen of Tests" and "Iconic as a Stethoscope." A key player involved is John Exner (1928-2006), credited with resurrecting this "most powerful psychometric instrument." VERDICT An important book that reminds us of the benefits and costs of generalizing about the most complicated matter on Earth: the -human mind. [See Prepub Alert, 8/22/16.]-E. James -Lieberman, George Washington Univ. Sch. of Medicine, -Washington, DC © Copyright 2017. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.